Next: The Fourier Transform as
Up: The Fourier Integral
Previous: Transition from Fourier Series
Contents
Index
The mathematically more precise statement of this theorem
is as follows:
Comments:
- This result can be restated as a Fourier transform pair,
 |
(233) |
 |
(234) |
whenever
is continuous.
- By interchanging integration order and letting
one has
 |
(235) |
This equation holds for all continuous functions
.
Thus
is another delta convergent sequence:
 |
(236) |
It is of course understood that
one first do the integration over
before taking to the indicated limit.
- Either one of the two equations, Eq.(2.35) or (2.36), is a generalized
completeness relation for the set of ``wave train'' functions,
However, these functions are not normalizable, i.e., they
. Instead, as Eq.(2.36) implies, they are said to be ``
-function normalized''.
Proof of the Fourier integral theorem:
The proof of the Fourier integral theorem presupposes that the Fourier
amplitude
is well-defined for each
.
That this is indeed the case follows from the finiteness of
:
The last inequality is an expression of the fact that
. Thus
is well-defined indeed.
The proof of the Fourier integral theorem runs parallel to the Fourier
series theorem on page
. We shall show that
where
The evaluation of the integrals is done by shifting the
integration variable. For the second integral one obtains
Using the fact that
and the fact that
is piecewise continuous everywhere, including at
, where
is the right hand derivative of
at
,
one finds that
with the help the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma.
A similar analysis yields
The sum of the last two equations yields
This validates Fourier's integral theorem.
Next: The Fourier Transform as
Up: The Fourier Integral
Previous: Transition from Fourier Series
Contents
Index
Ulrich Gerlach
2007-04-05