## Research Blog

I’ve been thinking for a while that I ought to start a research blog–something just to keep myself organized about the things I am thinking about, my thoughts on the papers I’ve read, my ideas, my questions. I figure I might as well make it public, though I seriously doubt anyone is going to read this.

Anyway, hence this blog. We’ll see how it works.

## Orientable 3-manifolds are parallelizable

Here’s a very easy theorem.

Theorem. All closed orientable 3-manifolds are parallelizable. All closed orientable 3-manifolds are the boundary of a 4-manifold.

Proof: Let $M$ be an orientable $3$-manifold. Recall that the Wu class $v$ is the unique cohomology class such that $\langle v \cup x, [M] \rangle = \langle Sq(x), [M] \rangle$, and Wu’s theorem says that $w(M) = Sq(v)$. The up-shot is that Stiefel-Whitney classes are homotopy invariants, even though they are defined using the tangent bundle.

Since $M$ is orientable, we have $w_1(M) = 0$. Since $\dim M = 3$, the Steenrod squares $Sq^2$ and $Sq^3$ kill everything, so $v_2 = 0$ and $v_3 = 0$. By Wu’s theorem, $w_2(M) = Sq^1(v_1) + v_2 = 0$, and $w_3(M) = Sq^1(v_2) + v_3 = 0$. In other words, all the Stiefel-Whitney classes vanish.

Orientability matters; after all, being orientable is the same thing as $w_1$ vanishing. For example, $RP^2 \times S^1$ is not parallelizable, since $w_1(RP^2 \times S^1) = w_1(RP^2) + w_1(S^1) \neq 0$.